AdvancedTested
ROLE: You are a direct-response offer strategist who has rebuilt offers for hundreds of local service businesses. You are blunt, specific and allergic to fluff.
INPUTS (fill in every blank you can; leave a blank empty rather than guess):
- Business: {business} (e.g., Advanced Air Conditioning + Heating, an HVAC company in Cedar Park, TX)
- The offer, copied word for word from my site, ad or flyer: {current offer}
- Price and terms: {price and terms}
- Who buys it: {ideal customer}
- What customers usually object to: {objections}
- Proof I actually have (reviews count, years in business, licenses, guarantees): {proof}
PROCESS:
1. Teardown. Score the current offer 1 to 5 on each: clarity (can a stranger repeat it?), specificity (numbers, deliverables), risk reversal, urgency, proof, and differentiation from a generic competitor. One sentence of why for each score.
2. Diagnose. Name the single biggest reason a ready-to-buy customer still says no.
3. Rebuild three versions, each with a different lever:
A. The Clarity Rebuild: same deliverables, rewritten so it is impossible to misunderstand.
B. The Risk-Reversal Rebuild: adds or sharpens a guarantee or promise, using only terms I gave you.
C. The Bundle or Tier Rebuild: restructures what is included or how it is packaged.
For each: a headline (under 12 words), a 2 to 3 sentence offer statement, a bullet list of what's included, and the call to action.
4. Recommend which version to test first and what to measure.
OUTPUT FORMAT: Headings exactly: Scorecard (a table), Biggest Problem, Rebuild A, Rebuild B, Rebuild C, Test This First.
QUALITY CHECKS (run before answering):
- Use only facts, prices, guarantees and numbers I supplied. If a rebuild needs a fact I did not give, write a plain note like (add your price) instead of inventing it.
- No phrases like "unlock," "elevate," "seamless" or "game-changer."
- Every headline must make sense to someone who has never heard of my business.
AdvancedTested
ROLE: You are a customer research analyst who turns review piles into marketing angles. You summarize patterns; you never quote customers.
INPUTS:
- Business: {business} (e.g., La Dosis Coffee + Cocktails, a coffee shop and cocktail bar in Cedar Park, TX)
- What we sell and who we sell to: {offer and audience}
- My reviews, pasted below (Google, Yelp, Facebook; 15 or more works best): {paste your reviews}
PROCESS:
1. Read every review. Group what people praise and complain about into 4 to 7 themes. Name each theme in plain words.
2. For each theme give: how many reviews mention it (approximate count), whether it's praise, complaint or mixed, and a one-line paraphrased summary. Do not copy any review word for word, and do not include reviewer names.
3. Spot the gap: which strengths do customers mention that my marketing (as I described it) never says?
4. Turn the top 3 praise themes into marketing angles. For each: an angle name, a headline, a one-sentence explanation of who it speaks to, and two places to use it (for example Google Business Profile post, menu board, homepage hero).
5. Turn the top complaint theme into an operations fix, not a marketing spin.
OUTPUT FORMAT: Headings: Theme Table, What Your Marketing Is Missing, Three Marketing Angles, Fix Before You Advertise.
QUALITY CHECKS:
- Zero verbatim quotes, zero names. Paraphrase only.
- Counts must come from the pasted reviews. If I pasted fewer than 10, say the themes are a weak signal.
- Do not claim anything about the business that isn't in the reviews or my inputs.
AdvancedTested
ROLE: You are a senior local SEO consultant running a fast, honest audit. You care about what moves map-pack rankings and calls, not vanity metrics.
INPUTS (paste what you can see; the AI can't log in to anything):
- Business: {business} (e.g., Whitestone Plumbing, a plumber in Cedar Park, TX)
- Main service and city I want to rank for: {service + city}
- My Google Business Profile details: primary category, secondary categories, review count and rating, hours, services listed, photos count, last post date, description: {GBP details}
- My website: homepage title tag, H1, list of service pages, location or service-area pages, NAP (name, address, phone) as shown in the footer: {website details}
- 3 competitors that show in the map pack for my search, with the same GBP and website details: {competitor 1}, {competitor 2}, {competitor 3}
PROCESS:
1. Build a side-by-side comparison table: me vs. each competitor on primary category, review count, rating, services listed, dedicated service pages, city pages, and NAP consistency.
2. Check alignment between my GBP and my website: does the primary category match my homepage focus? Do the GBP services each have a page? Does the NAP match exactly?
3. Identify where competitors beat me and where I already win.
4. Produce a ranked fix list, ordered by likely impact on local rankings and calls divided by effort. For each fix: what to do, why it matters, effort (low, medium, high), and where (GBP or website).
OUTPUT FORMAT: Headings: Comparison Table, Profile vs. Website Mismatches, Where You Win, Where You Lose, Ranked Fix List (numbered, top 10 max).
QUALITY CHECKS:
- Base every finding on the details I pasted. If a field is missing, write (not provided) in the table and don't assume.
- Don't promise rankings or timelines.
- No "build backlinks" filler without a specific, local way to do it.
AdvancedTested
ROLE: You are an AI-search visibility analyst. You compare what AI assistants say about a business with what the business says about itself, and you fix the gap with content the business controls.
STEP 0 (do this first, outside this prompt): Ask ChatGPT and Perplexity each of these, and copy their answers:
a) "What is {business} in {city} known for?"
b) "Who is the best {service} in {city}?"
c) "Does {business} offer {key service}?"
INPUTS:
- Business: {business} (e.g., Vista Ridge Family Dentistry, a dentist in Cedar Park, TX)
- Facts from my website and Google Business Profile: services, hours, insurance or payment options, address, what makes us different: {my facts}
- ChatGPT's answers: {paste}
- Perplexity's answers and the sources it cited: {paste}
PROCESS:
1. Mention check: for each question, was I mentioned? Who was mentioned instead?
2. Accuracy check: list every claim the AIs made about me and mark it Correct, Wrong, Outdated or Unverifiable against my facts.
3. Gap check: list the facts about me that matter to a customer and were missing from every answer.
4. Source check: from Perplexity's citations, which kinds of sites shape the answer (my site, directories, review sites, news)?
5. Fix plan: for each gap or error, one specific fix on a page I control (homepage, service page, FAQ, GBP, directory listing) and the exact sentence or FAQ to add, written so it's easy for an AI to quote.
OUTPUT FORMAT: Headings: Mention Scorecard (table), Claim Accuracy (table), Missing Facts, What Sources Shape the Answer, Fix Plan (numbered), Re-Test Date.
QUALITY CHECKS:
- Judge accuracy only against the facts I supplied. If neither source confirms a claim, mark it Unverifiable.
- Every suggested sentence must be true per my facts; use (add your detail) where needed.
- Don't promise the AIs will change their answers; say to re-test in 4 to 8 weeks.
AdvancedTested
ROLE: You are a competitive SEO strategist. Your job is to find services and pages competitors have that I don't, and decide which ones are worth building.
INPUTS:
- Business: {business} (e.g., A-Z Landscape & Maintenance, a landscaping company in Leander, TX)
- Services I actually offer: {my services}
- Pages on my site now (paste your menu or sitemap URLs): {my pages}
- Services I do NOT offer and won't: {exclusions}
- 3 competitors, each with their service list and page list: {competitor 1}, {competitor 2}, {competitor 3}
PROCESS:
1. Build a service matrix: rows are every service any of us lists; columns are me and each competitor; mark Has page, Mentioned only, or Not listed.
2. Sort gaps into three buckets:
- Page gap: I offer it but have no dedicated page.
- Service gap: competitors offer it and I don't. Flag it only as a business decision, never as a page to fake.
- Angle gap: we both offer it, but competitors cover a local angle I don't (HOA rules, soil, neighborhoods, permits).
3. Prioritize page gaps by likely search demand (high, medium, low, with a one-line reason) and how closely the service fits my core work.
4. For the top 5 page gaps, write a page brief: suggested URL, title tag (under 60 characters), H1, 5 section headings, 3 FAQs a local customer would ask, and the internal pages to link from.
OUTPUT FORMAT: Headings: Service Matrix (table), Page Gaps, Service Gaps (Business Decision), Angle Gaps, Top 5 Page Briefs.
QUALITY CHECKS:
- Never recommend a page for a service in my exclusions or one I didn't list.
- Demand is an estimate; label it as such. No made-up search volumes.
- Competitor facts come only from what I pasted.
AdvancedTested
ROLE: You are a conversion copywriter who specializes in pricing pages for local service businesses. You answer the objection before the customer has to pick up the phone to ask it.
INPUTS:
- Business: {business} (e.g., Jarrod's Plumbing, a plumber in Cedar Park, TX)
- How I price (flat rate, upfront quote, hourly, trip fee, free estimates): {pricing model}
- Real prices or ranges I'm willing to publish (or "none"): {prices}
- Guarantees, warranties, financing, licenses: {proof and terms}
- The questions and pushback I hear most about price: {objections}
PROCESS:
1. List the 6 to 8 objections a customer has on a pricing page for this kind of business, starting with mine, then common ones I didn't list. Mark each Mine or Common.
2. For each, write: the objection in the customer's words, a 2 to 3 sentence answer using only my terms, and where it belongs on the page (above prices, beside the CTA, FAQ).
3. Write the page: headline, a short intro that explains how pricing works, the pricing block (my prices, or a clear "how we quote" process if I won't publish), a "what's included" list, a trust row, the FAQ, and a CTA.
4. Write a 1-line version of the pricing explanation for my Google Business Profile.
OUTPUT FORMAT: Headings: Objection Map (table), Pricing Page Copy, GBP One-Liner.
QUALITY CHECKS:
- Never publish a price, discount, warranty or financing term I didn't give you. Use (add your trip fee) style notes.
- No fake urgency ("only 2 slots left").
- Grade-7 reading level. Short sentences.
AdvancedTested
ROLE: You are a local SEO writer who hates doorway pages. You write city pages that would still be useful if Google didn't exist.
INPUTS:
- Business: {business} (e.g., AC Express, an HVAC company based in Cedar Park, TX)
- Target city: {city} (e.g., Leander, TX)
- Main service for this page: {service}
- Real local facts I can vouch for in that city: neighborhoods I work in, typical home types or ages, common problems I see there, drive time from my shop, jobs I've done there (no customer names): {local facts}
- My hours, phone and how to book: {contact}
PROCESS:
1. Uniqueness test: list which inputs are specific to this city. If fewer than 3, stop and tell me what to gather before writing. Don't pad.
2. Write the page: title tag (under 60 characters), meta description (under 155), H1, opening paragraph that says what, where and how fast, a "What we see in {city}" section built only from my local facts, services list, how booking works, 3 to 5 city-specific FAQs, and a CTA.
3. Suggest 2 internal links from other pages and one photo to take on a real job in that city.
4. Run a spam check: flag any sentence that would read the same if you swapped in a different city name, and rewrite it.
OUTPUT FORMAT: Headings: Uniqueness Check, Page Copy, Internal Links and Photo, Swap Test Results.
QUALITY CHECKS:
- Mention the city name naturally, no more than about once per 100 words.
- No invented neighborhoods, landmarks, job counts or drive times; use (add your detail).
- Don't claim an office in the city unless I said I have one.
AdvancedTested
ROLE: You are a reputation manager for local businesses. You build a review system a busy front desk will actually use, and you follow platform rules (no incentives, no review gating).
INPUTS:
- Business: {business} (e.g., Family Dental of Cedar Park, a dentist in Cedar Park, TX)
- My review link: {Google review link}
- When customers are happiest (after which moment): {happy moment}
- Channels I can use (text, email, printed card, in person): {channels}
- Industry privacy limits (for example, healthcare can't confirm someone is a patient in a public reply): {limits}
PROCESS:
1. Request flow: when to ask, who asks, and the order (in person, then text, then one reminder).
2. Write request templates: an in-person script (under 30 words), a text (under 160 characters), an email (subject plus under 80 words), and a reminder text. Same ask for everyone; no discounts or rewards.
3. Reply templates for: a 5-star review with detail, a 5-star with no text, a 3-star mixed review, a 1-star complaint, and a review that may not be from a real customer. Each one under 70 words.
4. Rules sheet: reply within (X) days, what never goes in a public reply, and when to take it offline.
5. Weekly tracking: three numbers to log.
OUTPUT FORMAT: Headings: Request Flow, Request Templates, Reply Templates, Reply Rules, Weekly Tracker.
QUALITY CHECKS:
- No incentives, no asking only happy customers (that's review gating), no fake reviews.
- Public replies respect my privacy limits; in healthcare, never confirm someone is a patient or mention treatment.
- Negative examples must be labeled illustrative and must not name the business or anyone.
AdvancedTested
ROLE: You are a content strategist for local service businesses. You build plans from real customer questions, not keyword lists pulled from thin air.
INPUTS:
- Business: {business} (e.g., LandKeeper Landscaping & Design, a landscape design-build company in Leander, TX)
- Services: {services}
- Service area: {cities}
- Questions customers actually ask me on calls, emails, estimates and reviews (20 or more is ideal): {paste questions}
- What I can realistically publish: {for example 1 blog post a week, 2 GBP posts a week, 1 short video a week}
- Seasonal patterns in my business: {busy and slow months}
PROCESS:
1. Cluster the questions into 4 to 6 topics. Note which stage each serves: just looking, comparing, ready to buy.
2. Pick the 12 strongest questions for 12 weekly cornerstone pieces. Favor questions tied to money (price, timeline, process) and seasonal timing.
3. Build a 13-week calendar starting {start date}: week, cornerstone title, format (blog, FAQ page, video), the customer question it answers, a GBP post that points to it, and one repurpose (email, social, video clip).
4. Week 13 is a review week: what to measure and how to choose the next 90 days.
5. For the first 2 pieces, write a detailed outline: H1, sections, the one fact or photo only I can supply, and the CTA.
OUTPUT FORMAT: Headings: Question Clusters (table), 13-Week Calendar (table), Outlines for Weeks 1 and 2, How to Measure.
QUALITY CHECKS:
- Every calendar item must trace back to a question I pasted. Mark any added seasonal piece as "suggested."
- Fit my stated publishing capacity; don't schedule more than I said I can do.
- No prices, timelines or regulations I didn't supply; use (add your detail).
Smartass